Take meetings, for example. There are two ways you could take this:
- A few of your meetings are much more valuable than all the rest, or:
- You could make each meeting much shorter without losing much value
Both of those are debatable in practice, but it’s a fun exercise in intense intervention.
While I agree in theory, I think the problem with this sort of approach is that, while—per Sturgeon—90% of everything may be crap, you don’t know which 10% is the good stuff until you’ve gone through it all.