Listening to the new Of Montreal album confirms what I generally feel when listening to Of Montreal albums, which is that I don’t much care for Of Montreal. YMMV, obviously.
30 Words

I have been trying to give this Witcher show on Netflix a try, but it is… not good.
18 Words

We would all do well to be VERY skeptical of Lev Parnas.

Marcy Wheeler, writing at her blog about Rachel Maddow’s interview last night with Lev Parnas:

In short, for the last 18 months, Parnas has played a key part in creating the right wing echo chamber, one that — particularly because the addled Rudy is a trusted advisor — forms a key part of how Trump understands the world. One way Parnas did that was by recruiting Ukrainians who were, for very crass reasons, willing to tell Trump and the rest of the frothy right what they wanted to hear, even though it was assuredly not true.

Remarkably, we really don’t know why Parnas decided to play a key cog in the right wing echo chamber in the first place. He’s a grifter, but even with a recent cash infusion from Dmitro Firtash, he’s not getting rich. He was in a powerful position, the one sober person at Trump’s hotel bar, spinning up the drunk Trump sycophants. But that “power” got him indicted for the influence peddling that first landed him in this position. Before answering why he’s telling his story now, without immunity and while facing down still more charges, we’d want to understand that primary motivation, and we don’t know it yet.

Last night’s interview continued that grift, only he moved to spin an echo chamber for the left this time. He emphasized — and Maddow predictably responded — some of the key allegations Democrats most want to be true. Mike Pence is closely involved, Parnas revealed, and while nothing he revealed would amount to impeachable conduct, Democrats immediately latched onto the possibility it would be. Everyone was involved, Parnas confirmed, including Devin Nunes and Bill Barr. It was all about Biden, Parnas almost certainly lied.

In short, doing what he appears to be very good at, Parnas is telling us what we want to hear, whether true or not.

I generally like Rachel Maddow, and the corruption and incompetence of Trump’s circle of goons, grifters, and other hangers-on are bottomless, but that does not mean we should trust Parnas.

All day at work, I talk with people about the benefits of prioritization and WIP limits.

At home, I find myself in the middle of four novels and two audiobooks, unable to decide which ones to lay aside for the moment.

41 Words

Every time I see some story, post, or tweet breathlessly reporting the various US presidential candidates’ standing in national polls, I wonder what the point of this information is. We do not vote nationally in either the primaries or the general election. Paying attention to national polling seems like a recipe for missing the much more important state-level rankings of the candidates.
62 Words

This post on the Friend of a Friend standard is super-interesting, but I think the answer to the question of why the standard never achieved the wide adoption its supporters envisioned is pretty straightforward. As long as it depends on the average web user understanding and being able to use a relatively obscure format like RDF, most people are not going to use it.

After a week and a half of being very far away, there are a lot of great aspects to being home, not the least of which is having predictably good coffee.
31 Words

I watched Dark Phoenix on the plane overnight. I do not recommend it.
13 Words

Somehow, I have only just figured out that the Alex Garland who wrote The Beach is the same Alex Garland who directed Ex Machina and Annhilation.
26 Words

So far, Brisbane gets the award for best airport music. There is currently a Clash song playing, and before that it was Supergrass.
23 Words